So the results of the election are
in and few who study politics on an objective academic level are surprised at
all that the white house is not changing hands. One of the few laws that exist
in Politics is that Incumbents usually run for re-election and when they run
they win with unmistakable frequency. This rule is nearly scientific in the
congress. However, it holds true in the Presidency as well, in my lifetime since 1989
there has only been one incumbent that failed to win and I was far too young to
remember the 1992 presidential election In the history of the presidency there
have only been 8 (maybe 9) one term Presidents meaning that of the 57
presidential elections only about 14% have been lost by standing (or former)* Presidents making Mitts chances grim at best but considering that the state of the US
government has drastically changed over the years with the direct election of
senators and the Electoral College becoming a formality the rules of politics
have changed and since WWII there have only been 2 presidents that won the
first election and did not win the second one
(Carter and Bush sr.) suggesting an even stronger incumbency advantage.
One I anticipate will be repeated for the next 3 to 4 Presidents at least.
Now secondly I’m Proud of one thing
about our nation right now we had a fairly strong turnout for this election.
Someone told me and I read on Facebook that only 2/3rds of us voted
and I think those numbers are flat wrong. For one all the election results are
not in yet in many states still have as much as 20% of the vote still to count
according to the Fox election map and the current popular count was Obama 61.2
million and Romney 58.2 million I bet once it’s all said and done we will be
looking at a minimum of 120 million total votes counted meaning that of the
approximate 150 million people in our nation registered to vote all but about 30
million (or about a 5th) of registered voters did there are just north
of 200,000 eligible voters (meaning non-felon adults). We are still looking at
more than 60% of all eligible voters spoke in this election. Something we have
the right to be proud of I think.
Lastly I am still hearing something
from my family and friends that I think need to be addressed. “Obama won just
because he was black” I think there may be an element of truth to this statement
but I don’t think that the presidency was directly decided by race. At the end
of 2008 a large portion of the voting population was hopping mad at George Bush
jr. there was a huge bailout that just happened we had been at war that was incredibly
unpopular, Osoma was still on the loose and the economy was taking a turn for
the worse the 2008 and 2012 elections were going to be won by a Democrat. Many felt that they had given the GOP ample opportunity to handle the situation
and because they did not feel in danger anymore they were ready to give the
Democrats a turn in charge. The Republicans knew this there were half a dozen candidates
that were twice as strong as McCain (Perry, Romney, Gingrich, Rice or Cheney)
he was more or less sacrificed by the party in order to regroup and make an attempt for
the white house in 2012. If the republicans knew this you can also be that the
democrats knew this. They wanted to make history and do something never done
before. Looking at the primary elections on the Democratic side the top two candidates
were going to be a first in the White house either a woman (Hillary Clinton) or an
African American (Barack Obama). The Democrats decided that they had won the
2008 election and they had, there was no way that McCain or whoever else the
GOP put forward was going to pull it off so they were determined to make
history with who they nominated. Now race certainly did not hurt him but the
2008 election was going to be won by Micky mouse if he ran as a democrat. Party
was the determining factor not race. I almost wish the Republicans had run Condoleezza
Rice just to prove this point. Regardless Obama won because he was a Democrat
not because he was black.
*Grover Cleveland lost re-election but then served another
term making him a unique case.